Jeffrey Supinsky et al v. Kevin Richard Kelly, et al
| Jeffrey Supinsky and Valley East Building Management |
| Kevin R. Kelly, Kevin Richard Kelly and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01388 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Karen E Scott |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER [Dkt. 18] AND GRANTING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY RELATED TO GENERAL JURISDICTION #18 . The parties shall have until December 6, 2021 to conduct jurisdictional discovery. If Plaintiffs decide to amend their Complaint, they must do so by December 20, 2021. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 27 REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction /Motion to Transfer #18 filed by Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Eric Hull, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Eric Hull)(Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 26 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction /Motion to Transfer #18 filed by Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gary K. Brucker, Jr. in support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss/Transfer, #2 Proof of Service)(Brucker, Gary) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Denying Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application Regarding Conducting Jurisdictional Discovery (Dkt. #23 ). (twdb)
|
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Discovery regarding Conducting Jurisdictional Discovery and to Continue Motion Hearing #23 filed by Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly. (Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 23 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Discovery regarding Conducting Jurisdictional Discovery and to Continue Motion Hearing filed by Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brucker, Gary) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Randy S. Zelin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Jeffrey Supinsky et al., Plaintiffs, designating John L. Barber as local counsel. Granting #17 Non-Resident Attorney Randy S. Zelin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Jeffrey Supinsky et al., Plaintiffs, designating John L. Barber as local counsel. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Michael T. Contos APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Jeffrey Supinsky et al., Plaintiffs, designating John L. Barber as local counsel. Granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Michael T. Contos APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Jeffrey Supinsky et al., Plaintiffs, designating John L. Barber as local counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on December 2, 2021. (rrp) |
| Filing 19 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly, identifying Kevin Kelly and Benchmark Investments, LLC. (Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction /Motion to Transfer filed by Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly. Motion set for hearing on 11/1/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Declaration of Eric Hull, #3 Declaration Declaration of Kevin Kelly) (Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Randy S. Zelin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 9/16/2021, Receipt No. ACACDC-31995486) filed by Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael T. Contos to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 9/15/2021, Receipt No. ACACDC-31986569) filed by Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Randy S. Zelin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31995486) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section 1 of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael T. Contos to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31986569) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section 1 of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Randy S. Zelin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31995486) filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael T. Contos to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31986569) filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 11 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kevin Richard Kelly answer now due 9/20/2021, filed by Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly.(Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Brucker, Gary) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kevin Richard Kelly answer now due 9/9/2021, filed by Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly.(Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Document Nos. 4, 6, and 7 filed by Defendants Kevin Richard Kelly. (Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Randy Zelin. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management, upon Defendant Kevin Richard Kelly served on 7/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kevin Richard Kelly, defendant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (filed in state court 7/26/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 6) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Kevin Richard Kelly Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiffs Jeffrey Supinsky, Valley East Building Management. (filed in state court 7/16/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kevin R. Kelly, (Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Kevin R. Kelly. (Hull, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01210778 Receipt No: ACACDC-31858494 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant's Kevin R. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Payment Receipt, #4 Exhibit Notice of Hearing Case Management Conference, #5 Exhibit Summons to Jeffrey Supinsky, #6 Exhibit Proof of Service, #7 Exhibit Notice of Relocation, #8 Exhibit Affidavit of Due Diligence) (Attorney Eric Blair Hull added to party Kevin R. Kelly(pty:dft))(Hull, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
