Scott Robinson et al v. Airbahn Inc
Plaintiff: Scott Robinson and Daniel Reynolds
Defendant: Airbahn Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2021cv01401
Filed: August 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: John D Early
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2021 Filing 20 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal from Orange County Superior Court. Case Number:30-02021-01212245 CU-WT-CJC. (et)
October 1, 2021 Filing 19 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court. (twdb)
October 1, 2021 Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND #12 ; DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS #14 ; AND REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. finding as moot #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case; granting #12 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court. Case Remanded to Orange County Superior Court 30-2021-01212245-CU-WT-CJC. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb) Modified on 10/1/2021 (twdb).
September 27, 2021 Filing 17 (OPPOSITION TO AIRBAHN, INC'S MOTION TO DISMISS, filed as) to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #10 filed by Plaintiffs Daniel Reynolds, Scott Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Connor M. Karen In Support of Opposition, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration)(Karen, Connor) Modified on 9/28/2021 (twdb).
September 27, 2021 Filing 16 Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #12 filed by Defendant Airbahn Inc. (Linehan, Jessica)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation to Coordinate Hearing Dates on Plaintiffs' and Defendant's Pending Motions #14 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
September 9, 2021 Filing 14 First STIPULATION to Continue hearing dates from October 4, 2021 to October 18, 2021 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #10 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #11 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #12 filed by Plaintiffs Daniel Reynolds, Scott Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Karen, Connor)
September 8, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE to Federal Court of Notice to State Court of Removal and Notice to Plaintiffs of Case Assignment to Judge David O. Carter filed by Defendant Airbahn Inc. (Linehan, Jessica)
September 8, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs Daniel Reynolds, Scott Robinson. Motion set for hearing on 10/18/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Ps&As, #2 Declaration Connor M. Karen, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Proposed Order) (Attorney Connor M Karen added to party Daniel Reynolds(pty:pla)) (Karen, Connor)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 10/4/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
September 3, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Airbahn Inc. Motion set for hearing on 10/4/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Airbahn Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, #2 Declaration of Jessica Linehan in Support of Defendant Airbahn Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, #3 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Airbahn Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint) (Linehan, Jessica)
September 2, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
September 1, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael L Kelly on behalf of Plaintiffs Daniel Reynolds, Scott Robinson (Kelly, Michael)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
August 30, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
August 30, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
August 30, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil)
August 27, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Scott Robinson, Daniel Reynolds in Orange County Superior Court on 7/26/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil)
August 27, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Airbahn Inc, identifying Airbahn, Inc., Scott Robinson and Daniel Reynolds. (Linehan, Jessica)
August 27, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Airbahn Inc. (Linehan, Jessica)
August 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01212245-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-31888317 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Airbahn Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jessica Linehan in Support of Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 (Federal Question), 1441, and 1446, #2 Appendix of State Court Filings in Support of Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 (Federal Question), 1441, and 1446) (Attorney Jessica Lauren Linehan added to party Airbahn Inc(pty:dft))(Linehan, Jessica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott Robinson et al v. Airbahn Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Robinson
Represented By: Heather Marie Baker Dobbs
Represented By: Michael L Kelly
Represented By: Connor M Karen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Reynolds
Represented By: Heather Marie Baker Dobbs
Represented By: Michael L Kelly
Represented By: Connor M Karen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Airbahn Inc
Represented By: Jessica Lauren Linehan
Represented By: Faisal M Zubairi
Represented By: Jill Gutierrez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?