Krystal Reed v. Bridge Diagnostics LLC et al
Plaintiff: Krystal Reed
Defendant: Bridge Diagnostics LLC, Bridge Diagnostics, LLC and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2021cv01409
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2021 Filing 16 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bridge Diagnostics, LLC answer now due 10/29/2021, re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #15 filed by Defendants Bridge Diagnostics, LLC.(Baran, Christine)
October 1, 2021 Filing 15 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bridge Diagnostics, LLC answer now due 10/15/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Bridge Diagnostics, LLC.(Attorney Christine Baran added to party Bridge Diagnostics, LLC(pty:dft))(Baran, Christine)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #11 Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Krystal Reed Plaintiff, designating Ian M. Silvers as local counsel. Granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Krystal Reed Plaintiff, designating Ian M. Silvers as local counsel. (twdb)
September 22, 2021 Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Krystal Reed (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 9/22/2021, Receipt No. ACACDC-32025404) filed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Chase, Brian)
September 22, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Krystal Reed (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32025404) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. (lt)
September 22, 2021 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Krystal Reed (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32025404) filed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed. (Chase, Brian)
September 20, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed, upon Defendant Bridge Diagnostics, LLC served on 9/10/2021, answer due 10/1/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Tiina G, Register Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Chase, Brian)
August 31, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael L. Fradin. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bridge Diagnostics, LLC. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
August 30, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed, identifying Plaintiff Krystal Reed and Defendant Bridge Diagnostics, LLC. (Chase, Brian)
August 30, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed. (Chase, Brian)
August 30, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed. (Chase, Brian)
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31897085 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Krystal Reed. (Attorney Brian D Chase added to party Krystal Reed(pty:pla))(Chase, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krystal Reed v. Bridge Diagnostics LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krystal Reed
Represented By: Brian D Chase
Represented By: Ian M. Silvers
Represented By: Michael L. Fradin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridge Diagnostics LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridge Diagnostics, LLC
Represented By: Andrew C Crane
Represented By: Christine Baran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?