Erika Caramella et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
ERIKA CARAMELLA, CRAIG CARAMELLA and Caramella Craig |
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and DOES 1-25 |
8:2021cv01463 |
September 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Karen E Scott |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court. (twdb) |
![]() |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Erika Caramella ERIKA CARAMELLA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 First-Amended Complaint)(Nevell, Todd) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 13 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Caramella Craig.. (Nevell, Todd) |
Filing 12 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff ERIKA CARAMELLA.. (Nevell, Todd) |
![]() |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on November 18, 2021. (rrp) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Tropp, Deborah) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 9/7/21 and 9/8/21. (Tropp, Deborah) |
Filing 7 NOTICE filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. RE: CORRECTION OF PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY (Tropp, Deborah) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
NON CONFORM COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Erika Caramella, Craig Caramella, upon Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation served on 8/25/2021, answer due 9/15/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent, by serving Diana Ruiz, Authorized Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does 1 TO 25., filed by plaintiffs Erika Caramella, Craig Caramella. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/2/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, identifying Erika Caramella, Craig Caramella, Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Tropp, Deborah) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Tropp, Deborah) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County, case number 30-2020-01147051-CU-PO-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-31940232 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Deborah S Tropp added to party COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Tropp, Deborah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.