Spearhead Network Tech, Inc. v. Stackcurve, Inc.
| Spearhead Network Tech Inc. |
| 8:2021cv01534 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Spearhead Network Tech Inc.. (Pogodin, Pavel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32007043 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Spearhead Network Tech Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Pavel Igor Pogodin added to party Spearhead Network Tech Inc.(pty:pla))(Pogodin, Pavel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spearhead Network Tech, Inc. v. Stackcurve, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Spearhead Network Tech Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Pavel Igor Pogodin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
