Skyrcrest Holding Trust, Hadeel Samarri as Trustee v. Razaghi et al
| Skyrcrest Holding Trust, Hadeel Samarri as Trustee |
| Karmran Razaghi, Ellie Razaghi and Does 1 to 5 |
| 8:2021cv01561 |
| September 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Karen E Scott |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Cormac J. Carney: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (REMOVAL). SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Show Cause Response due by 10/15/2021.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Orange, case number 30-02021-01210020-CL-UD-CJC with Conformed copy of complaint. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Filing fee $402 PAID, filed by Defendant Karmran Razaghi. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
