Kevin Clinton Conkle v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Kevin Clinton Conkle |
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
8:2021cv01571 |
September 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Margo A Rocconi |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi for all further proceedings. Please use the case number SACV21-1571 MAR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 10/4/2021, answer due 1/2/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Perales, Monica) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: 1. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days from the date service is completed. Government counsel must file a notice of appearance within 30 days of service of the action. [See document for further details.] (es) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi: IT IS ORDERED that the REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. (es) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle, (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Kevin Clinton Conkle. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Kevin Clinton Conkle(pty:pla))(Perales, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.