Manuel Magallon v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. et al
| Manuel Magallon |
| XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 |
| 8:2021cv01644 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| James V Selna |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 12/27/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint. (ts) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-01644-DOC-ADSx. (dta)
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (dgo) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01644 JVS (ADSx). (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Manuel Magallon. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/20/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration #3 , Declaration #4 served on October 4, 2021. (Hadacek, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. (Hadacek, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Joseph D. Hadacek re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.. (Hadacek, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Justin Baro re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.. (Hadacek, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.. (Hadacek, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Orange, case number 30-2021-01217148 Receipt No: ACACDC-32097458 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Joseph D Hadacek added to party XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hadacek, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
