Luz H. Guzman v. Ford Motor Company et al
| LUZ GUZMAN and Luz H. Guzman |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY, David Wilsons Ford of Orange and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01655 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 36
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Tionna Dolin counsel for Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. Karin Kuemerle is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. (Dolin, Tionna)
|
|
Filing 35
TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - Central Justice Center. Case number: 30-02021-01196651-CU-BC-CJC. (jp)
|
|
Filing 34
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #11 by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Motion is GRANTED. This action will be remanded to state court forthwith. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) See document for further information. (jp)
|
|
Filing 33
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange #11 . The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for June 23, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., is VACATED, and the Court takes the matter UNDER SUBMISSION. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER ON PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES (CIVIL CASES) by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
|
Filing 31
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange #11 filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit K)(Law, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 30
REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange #11 filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. (Law, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 29
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Daniel A Law on behalf of Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman (Attorney Daniel A Law added to party Luz H. Guzman(pty:pla))(Law, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 28
OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange #11 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Mortenson, #2 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #3 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #4 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #5 Exhibit 4 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #6 Exhibit 5 to Decl. of M. Mortenson)(Jun, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 27
Notice of Electronic Filing re Scheduling Order,,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #26 , Text Only Scheduling Notice, 23 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #25 , Statement #24 e-mailed to Karin Kuemerle bounced due to 550-5.4.1 Recipient address rejected. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lmh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 26
MINUTES SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The Court sets the following schedule: Jury Trial set for 12/5/2023 at 8:30 AM. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 11/16/2023 at 8:30 AM. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties: 9/8/2022. Non-Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 7/20/2023. Last Date to Hear Motions: 8/24/2023. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference: 9/7/2023. Motions in Limine with Proposed Orders: 10/26/2023. Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order: 11/2/2023. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 25
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
|
Filing 24
STATEMENT Case Management filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman (Harman-Holmes, Ariel)
|
|
Filing 23
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: The court hereby RESETS the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange #11 for June 23, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 22
REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Please refer to Order for complete details. (jp)
|
|
Filing 21
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ariel Harman-Holmes counsel for Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. Adding Ariel Harman-Holmes as counsel of record for Luz H. Guzman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. (Attorney Ariel Harman-Holmes added to party Luz H. Guzman(pty:pla))(Harman-Holmes, Ariel)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#OCJ 22-074) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Slaughter, Fred W., this case is transferred from Judge Josephine L. Staton to the calendar of Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-01655-FWS-ADSx. (sn)
|
|
Filing 19
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Judge Josephine L. Staton - Effective Monday, March 21, 2022, Judge Josephine L. Staton will be located in the First Street U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 8A, on the 8th floor, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 8A of the First Street U.S. Courthouse unless otherwise ordered by the Court. For additional information regarding mandatory chambers copies and the use of Zoom hearings in civil matters, please refer to Judge Staton's Procedures & Schedules Page on the Court's website: https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-josephine-l-staton. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than March 31, 2023. (dca)
|
|
Filing 17
CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (dca)
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTES (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing 2/25/2022 is VACATED and the following schedule is set. Last Day to File a Motion to Add Parties or Amend Pleadings: 4/22/2022. Fact Discovery Cutoff: 1/20/2023. Last Day to File Motions (Excluding Daubert Motions and all other Motions in Limine): 2/3/2023. Last Day to Serve Initial Expert Reports: 2/3/2023. Last Day to Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports: 3/3/2023. Expert Discovery Cutoff: 3/24/2023. Last Day to Conduct Settlement Proceedings: 3/31/2023. Last Day to File Motions in Limine and Daubert Motions: 9/15/2023. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2023 at 10:30 AM. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 15
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 to 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman.. (Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 14
Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman, identifying Luz H. Guzman and Strategic Legal Practices, APC. (Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
|
|
Filing 12
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange #11 filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. (Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. Motion set for hearing on 7/8/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Karin Kuemerle in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Remand) (Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Karin Kuemerle on behalf of Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman (Attorney Karin Kuemerle added to party Luz H. Guzman(pty:pla))(Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Change of address by Tionna Dolin attorney for Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. Changing attorneys address to 1888 Century Park East, 19th Floor, Los Angeles,CA 90067. Filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. (Dolin, Tionna)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 2/25/2022 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (dca)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants David Wilsons Ford of Orange, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman. Filed in State Court on 10/6/2021 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 10/8/2021 (car).
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Luz H. Guzman pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to David Wilsons Ford of Orange Without prejudice. Filed in State Court on 9/7/2021 Submitted with Attachment 4 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Filed in State Court on 6/9/2021 submitted with Attachment 6 to Notice of Removal #1 (Attorney David M Keithly added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(car)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, (Mortenson, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Mortenson, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ORANGE, case number 30-2021-01196651-CU-BCCJC Receipt No: ACACDC-32113596 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Mortenson, #2 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #3 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #4 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #5 Exhibit 4 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #6 Exhibit 5 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #7 Exhibit 6 to Decl. of M. Mortenson) (Attorney Michael Donn Mortenson added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Mortenson, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
