Brian Traister v. Albertsons LLC et al
| Brian Traister |
| Albertson's LLC, Albertsons LLC and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01735 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for December 10, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. The Court will issue a separate Scheduling Order upon review of the parties' Joint 26(f) Report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; Proposed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates ; estimated length of trial 12, filed by Plaintiff Brian Traister.. (Gonzalez, Brandon) |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. A Scheduling Conference is set for Friday 12/10/2021 at 10:30 a.m. See attached Order for details. (eva)
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (eva) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge James V. Selna. Case transferred from Judge James V. Selna to the calendar of Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 8:21-cv-01735-JLS-(KESx). (dve)
|
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Albertsons LLC. Filed in State Court on 10/18/2021 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit B to Declaration of Ray E. Boggess #3 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Albertsons LLC, Does 1 through 25, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Brian Traister. Filed in State Court on 9/8/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Declaration of Ray E. Boggess #3 (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC, identifying Brian Traister; Albertson's LLC; Albertsons Companies, Inc.. (Boggess, Ray) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of JIM TAYLOR re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Boggess, Ray) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of BIPASHA MUKHERJEE re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Boggess, Ray) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Ray E. Boggess re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Boggess, Ray) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Boggess, Ray) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, case number 30-2021-01219924-CU-WT-NJC with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 10/19/2021, receipt number 32180425), filed by Defendant Albertson's LLC. (Attorney Ray Edward Boggess added to party Albertson's LLC(pty:dft))(Boggess, Ray) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
