Joshua Dinnerman et al v. Datto, Inc. et al
Joshua David Dinnerman, Paul Feinberg, Pacific Information Technologies, Pacific Business KK and Technology Design Systems, LTD |
Datto, Inc. and Open Mesh, Inc. |
8:2021cv01771 |
October 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
James V Selna |
Josephine L Staton |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. § 2301 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 26 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case /Complaint filed by Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/27/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit Affidvait of A. Collicelli ISO Datto and Open Mesh MTD, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Henry, Sascha) |
Filing 25 Text Only GRANTING Application of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey J. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc. #22 pursuant to the Courts directive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 24 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey J. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32486290) #22 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case was reassigned on 11/23/21. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials are incorrect on application and proposed order. (lt) |
Filing 23 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jennifer Elaine Pennington counsel for Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc.. Adding Jennifer Elaine Pennington as counsel of record for Datto, Inc. and Open Mesh, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Datto, Inc. and Open Mesh, Inc.. (Attorney Jennifer Elaine Pennington added to party Datto, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Jennifer Elaine Pennington added to party Open Mesh, Inc. (pty:dft))(Pennington, Jennifer) |
Filing 22 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey J. White to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32486290) filed by defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Henry, Sascha) |
Filing 21 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Datto, Inc. answer now due 12/17/2021; Open Mesh, Inc. answer now due 12/17/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by defendants Datto, Inc.; Open Mesh, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Henry, Sascha) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc., identifying Datto Holding Corporation. (Henry, Sascha) |
Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc. identifying Datto Holding Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Henry, Sascha) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Sascha V M Henry on behalf of Defendants Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc. (Attorney Sascha V M Henry added to party Datto, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Sascha V M Henry added to party Open Mesh, Inc. (pty:dft))(Henry, Sascha) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pacific Business KK, Joshua David Dinnerman, Pacific Information Technologies, Paul Feinberg, Technology Design Systems, LTD, upon Defendant Open Mesh, Inc. served on 10/29/2021, answer due 11/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rylynn Poole in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pacific Business KK, Joshua David Dinnerman, Pacific Information Technologies, Paul Feinberg, Technology Design Systems, LTD, upon Defendant Datto, Inc. served on 11/15/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Montijo in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Datto, Inc., Open Mesh, Inc.. (es) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiffs Joshua David Dinnerman, Paul Feinberg, Pacific Business KK, Pacific Information Technologies, Technology Design Systems, LTD. (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Summons and No. 2 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01771 JVS (DFMx). (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32207730 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Pacific Business KK, Joshua David Dinnerman, Pacific Information Technologies, Paul Feinberg, Technology Design Systems, LTD. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Gary R Carlin added to party Joshua David Dinnerman (pty:pla), Attorney Gary R Carlin added to party Paul Feinberg (pty:pla), Attorney Gary R Carlin added to party Pacific Business KK(pty:pla), Attorney Gary R Carlin added to party Pacific Information Technologies (pty:pla), Attorney Gary R Carlin added to party Technology Design Systems, LTD(pty:pla))(Carlin, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.