Kenneth Rich v. Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rich Kenneth and Kenneth Rich
Defendant: Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc., PHH Mortgage Corporation and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Case Number: 8:2021cv01785
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #13 , by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PHH shall have until January 3, 2022 to file an answer or other responsive pleading. (twdb)
December 1, 2021 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to PHH Mortgage Corporation answer now due 1/3/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gill, Simren)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-01785-CJC-(DFMx). (dve)
October 29, 2021 Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
October 28, 2021 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to PHH Mortgage Corporation answer now due 12/3/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation.(Gill, Simren)
October 28, 2021 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation, re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 served on 10/28/21. (Gill, Simren)
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
October 28, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
October 28, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car)
October 27, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc., Does 1 through 10, Inclusive, PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Rich. Filed in State Court on 8/9/2021 submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
October 27, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Gill, Simren)
October 27, 2021 Filing 4 Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation, (Gill, Simren)
October 27, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation identifying PHH Corporation and Ocwen Financial Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Gill, Simren)
October 27, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Gill, Simren)
October 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01215622 Receipt No: ACACDC-32229327 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attorney Simren Kaur Gill added to party PHH Mortgage Corporation(pty:dft))(Gill, Simren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kenneth Rich v. Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rich Kenneth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Rich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: Simren Kaur Gill
Represented By: Jennifer A. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?