Kenneth Rich v. Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc. et al
Rich Kenneth and Kenneth Rich |
Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc., PHH Mortgage Corporation and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
8:2021cv01785 |
October 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Douglas F McCormick |
Truth in Lending |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #13 , by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PHH shall have until January 3, 2022 to file an answer or other responsive pleading. (twdb) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to PHH Mortgage Corporation answer now due 1/3/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gill, Simren) |
Filing 12 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:21-cv-01785-CJC-(DFMx). (dve) |
Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to PHH Mortgage Corporation answer now due 12/3/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation.(Gill, Simren) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation, re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #8 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 served on 10/28/21. (Gill, Simren) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Campbell Commerce Mortgage, Inc., Does 1 through 10, Inclusive, PHH Mortgage Corporation, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Rich. Filed in State Court on 8/9/2021 submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Gill, Simren) |
Filing 4 Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation, (Gill, Simren) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation identifying PHH Corporation and Ocwen Financial Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Gill, Simren) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Gill, Simren) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01215622 Receipt No: ACACDC-32229327 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation. (Attorney Simren Kaur Gill added to party PHH Mortgage Corporation(pty:dft))(Gill, Simren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.