Mekhala Smith v. Paddy Murphys, Inc. et al
| Mekhala Smith |
| Paddy Murphys, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Ecstasy Theater, Olivia T Nguyen, Doe Manager and Does 4-10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01903 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| John D Early |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #16 Defendants' MOTION to Compel Arbitration [Dkt. 16]. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs collective claims. The Court further DISMISSES this action WITH PREJUDICE. Case Terminated, MD JS-6. (twdb)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #16 filed by Defendants Olivia T Nguyen, Paddy Murphys, Inc.. (Frick, Robyn) |
| Filing 19 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #16 filed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John P. Kristensen, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of John P. Kristensen)(Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Certification of interested parties should be docketed using the correct event Notice of Interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on March 17, 2022. (rrp) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendants Olivia T Nguyen, Paddy Murphys, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 2/14/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Interested Parties, #2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Motion to Compel Arbitration, #3 Declaration of Robyn E. Frick, #4 Declaration of Jon Bardon, #5 (Proposed) Order) (Frick, Robyn) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robyn E Frick counsel for Defendants Olivia T Nguyen, Paddy Murphys, Inc.. Filed by Defendant Paddy Murphy's, Inc. dba Ecstasy Theater and Olivia T. Nguyen. (Attorney Robyn E Frick added to party Olivia T Nguyen(pty:dft), Attorney Robyn E Frick added to party Paddy Murphys, Inc.(pty:dft))(Frick, Robyn) |
| Filing 14 Corrected STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Olivia T Nguyen, Paddy Murphys, Inc..(White, Leigh) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Olivia T Nguyen answer now due 1/13/2022; Paddy Murphys, Inc. answer now due 1/13/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Olivia T Nguyen; Paddy Murphys, Inc..(Attorney Leigh A White added to party Olivia T Nguyen(pty:dft), Attorney Leigh A White added to party Paddy Murphys, Inc.(pty:dft))(White, Leigh) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith, upon Defendant Paddy Murphys, Inc. served on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Paddy Murphys, Inc. dba Ecstasy Theater in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service re Paddy Murphys)(Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith, upon Defendant Olivia T Nguyen served on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Olivia T. Nguyen in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service re Olivia Nguyen)(Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Olivia T Nguyen. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Paddy Murphys, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith, (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32351746 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Mekhala Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Mekhala Smith Signed Consent) (Attorney John P Kristensen added to party Mekhala Smith(pty:pla))(Kristensen, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
