Noah Aria Saeedy v. The Regents of the University of California
Noah Aria Saeedy |
The Regents of the University of California |
8:2021cv01911 |
November 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
John D Early |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MINUTES OF Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge John D. Early. After approximately 4 hours and 45 minutes of discussions and consideration, the parties did not reach a settlement of the case. The parties were reminded to comply with any and all of Judge Carter's reporting requirements. (hr) |
Filing 18 AMENDED ORDER ON STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES TO CONTINUE THE JANUARY 24, 2022 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ALL RELATED DATES by Judge David O. Carter, re #17 , #16 . (twdb) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation by all Parties to Continue the January 24, 2022 Scheduling Conference and Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and all Related Dates #16 . IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant The Regents of the University of Californias (Defendant or The Regents) Motion to Dismiss currently on calendar for January 24, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. is continued to March 28, 2022 at 8:30a.m. ( Scheduling Conference continued to 3/28/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter.) (twdb) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION for Reconsideration , STIPULATION to Reschedule January 24, 2022 scheduling conference filed by defendant The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shao, Erika) |
Filing 15 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 1/24/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (kd) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Motion to Dismiss. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 14 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge David O. Carter. Outside the presence of the court reporter, the parties agree to schedule a settlement conference with the Magistrate Judge. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (lom) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Per the directive of the Honorable David O. Carter, United States District Judge, with scheduling input from the parties, a Settlement Conference will be held before Magistrate Judge John D. Early via videoconference on January 12, 2022, starting at 10:00 a.m. and continuing until terminated by the Court. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed by defendant The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Erika L. Shao, #3 Proposed Order)(Lomibao, Nicole) Modified on 12/20/2021 (twdb). |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter Status Conference set for 12/17/2021 08:00 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kdu) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Noah Aria Saeedy answer now due 12/17/2021, filed by defendant The Regents of the University of California.(Shao, Erika) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01911-DOC (JDEx). (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COMPLAINT against Defendant The Regents of the University of California., filed by Plaintiff Noah Aria Saeedy. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 4 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 11/19/2021, receipt number ACACDC-32357881), filed by defendant The Regents of the University of California.(Lomibao, Nicole) Modified on 11/22/2021 (et). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant The Regents of the University of California, (Lomibao, Nicole) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Regents of the University of California. (Lomibao, Nicole) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01197043-CU-CR-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-32357881 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Erika L. Shao, #2 Certificate of Service of Notice to State Court and Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court) (Attorney Nicole Lomibao added to party The Regents of the University of California(pty:dft))(Lomibao, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.