Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. v. Vizio, Inc. et al
| Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. |
| Vizio, Inc. and Does 1 to 50, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv01943 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference and Consolidate hearings on Pending Motions (Doc. #18 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #14 and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #12 shall both be heard on 6/3/2022. (2) The 2/4/2022 Scheduling Conference (Doc. #13 ) shall be continued to 7/1/2022 at 10:30 AM. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing 18
Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from February 4, 2022 to July 1, 2022 filed by Defendant Vizio, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yin, Zhaoxin)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc., identifying Vizio Holding Corp. (Vakili, Sa'id)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange #14 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court)(Vakili, Sa'id)
|
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby continues the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to Orange County Superior Court #14 currently set for May 27, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. to June 3, 2022 at 10:30 a.m.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange filed by plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/27/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Vakili, Sa'id)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 2/4/2022 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint; And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof filed by Defendant Vizio, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/13/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Williams, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Vizio, Inc., served on December 1, 2021. (Yin, Zhaoxin)
|
|
Filing 10
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sa'id Vakili counsel for Plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc.. Adding Jason C. Ming as counsel of record for Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc.. (Vakili, Sa'id)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Zhaoxin Yin counsel for Defendant VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation. Adding Zhaoxin Yin as counsel of record for VIZIO, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant VIZIO, Inc.. (Attorney Zhaoxin Yin added to party VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation(pty:dft))(Yin, Zhaoxin)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel C Posner counsel for Defendant VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation. Adding Daniel C Posner as counsel of record for VIZIO, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant VIZIO, Inc.. (Attorney Daniel C Posner added to party VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation(pty:dft))(Posner, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation, identifying VIZIO Holding Corp.. (Williams, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation. (Williams, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Orange, case number 30-2021-01226723-CU-BC-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-32389773 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7) (Attorney Michael E Williams added to party VIZIO, INC., a California Corporation(pty:dft))(Williams, Michael)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc., upon Defendant Vizio, Inc. served on 11/3/2021, answer due 11/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cate Hidalgo, Office Administrator in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/03/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Vizio, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/19/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
