Garan, Inc. et al v. Ghost Management Group, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Garan, Inc. and Garan Services Corporation
Defendant: Ghost Management Group, LLC and Weedmaps Media, LLC doing business as Weedmaps
Case Number: 8:2021cv01986
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Filing 20 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Ghost Management Group, LLC, Weedmaps Media, LLC identifying WM Technology, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Zimmermann, Kollin)
January 27, 2022 Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Ghost Management Group, LLC, Weedmaps Media, LLC.(Attorney Kollin J. Zimmermann added to party Ghost Management Group, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Kollin J. Zimmermann added to party Weedmaps Media, LLC(pty:dft))(Zimmermann, Kollin)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 03/07/2022 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 2/28/2022. (lb)
December 28, 2021 Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Weedmaps Media, LLC answer now due 1/27/2022; Ghost Management Group, LLC answer now due 1/27/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Weedmaps Media, LLC; Ghost Management Group, LLC.(Attorney Dennis L Wilson added to party Ghost Management Group, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Dennis L Wilson added to party Weedmaps Media, LLC(pty:dft))(Wilson, Dennis)
December 9, 2021 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garan, Inc., Garan Services Corporation, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sieff, Adam)
December 9, 2021 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garan, Inc., Garan Services Corporation, upon Defendant Weedmaps Media, LLC served on 12/7/2021, answer due 12/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Sieff, Adam)
December 9, 2021 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garan, Inc., Garan Services Corporation, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sieff, Adam)
December 9, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garan, Inc., Garan Services Corporation, upon Defendant Ghost Management Group, LLC served on 12/7/2021, answer due 12/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Sieff, Adam)
December 7, 2021 Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
December 6, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney G. Roxanne Elings on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
December 6, 2021 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ghost Management Group, LLC, Weedmaps Media, LLC. (et)
December 6, 2021 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
December 6, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
December 6, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et)
December 6, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01986-JVS (DFMx). (et)
December 3, 2021 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Garan Services Corporation, Garan, Inc.. (Sieff, Adam)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Garan Services Corporation, Garan, Inc., (Sieff, Adam)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Garan Services Corporation, Garan, Inc.. (Sieff, Adam)
December 3, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Garan Services Corporation, Garan, Inc.. (Sieff, Adam)
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32426126 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Garan, Inc., Garan Services Corporation. (Attorney Adam S Sieff added to party Garan Services Corporation(pty:pla), Attorney Adam S Sieff added to party Garan, Inc.(pty:pla))(Sieff, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garan, Inc. et al v. Ghost Management Group, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garan, Inc.
Represented By: Adam S Sieff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garan Services Corporation
Represented By: Adam S Sieff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ghost Management Group, LLC
Represented By: Kollin J. Zimmermann
Represented By: Dennis L Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weedmaps Media, LLC doing business as Weedmaps
Represented By: Kollin J. Zimmermann
Represented By: Dennis L Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?