Esteban Morales v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
| Esteban Morales |
| California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. |
| 8:2021cv01988 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #28 , by Judge David O. Carter. CPKs Response to the Complaint is extended by not more than 30 days, up to and including February 17, 2022. (twdb)
|
| Filing 28 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendant California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Michael Keith Grimaldi added to party California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.(pty:dft))(Grimaldi, Michael) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #26 Non-Resident Attorney Daniel O. Herrera APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Esteban Morales, Plaintiffs, designating Roland K. Tellis as local counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 26 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel O. Herrera to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 12/10/2021, Receipt No. 32460774) filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales, re: Initial Standing Order Following Assignment of Civil Case to Judge David O. Carter served on 12/09/2021. (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Esteban Morales, upon Defendant California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. served on 12/7/2021, answer due 12/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon James Hyatt, Chief Executive Officer in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Tellis, Roland) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: granting #17 Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Esteban Morales, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, designating Roland K. Tellis as local counsel. (lom)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #21 Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Esteban Morales, designating Roland K. Tellis as local counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 12/10/2021, Receipt No. 32460702) filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION to CORRECTED APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32460702) #16 #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64) Other error(s) with document(s): Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests.. Application.. Appear Pro Hac Vice. Note: Wrong event does not provide relief or changes sought. (lt) |
| Filing 19 APPLICATION to CORRECTED APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32460702) #16 filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32460702) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state and/or federal courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. (lt) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Daniel O. Herrera to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32460774) filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J. Hagman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Esteban Morales (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32460702) filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 15 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 21-01 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:21-cv-01928-DOC-KESx. Case referred from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 8:21-cv-01988-DOC(KESx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (dta)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Esteban Morales, (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Nickolas J Hagman on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Daniel O. Herrera on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Bryan L Clobes on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01988-DOC (DFMx). (et) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff ESTEBAN MORALES. (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ESTEBAN MORALES. (Tellis, Roland) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32414102 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff ESTEBAN MORALES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint) (Attorney Roland K Tellis added to party ESTEBAN MORALES(pty:pla))(Tellis, Roland) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
