Joshua Hull v. Continental Service Group Inc
| Joshua C Hull |
| Continental Service Group Inc doing business as Conserve |
| 8:2021cv01992 |
| December 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE by Judge David O. Carter: The Court, having been notified by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled re Notice of Settlement #11 , hereby orders this action DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby orders ALL proceedings in the case VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for 60 days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been consummated. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Joshua C Hull. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joshua C Hull, upon Defendant Continental Service Group Inc served on 12/15/2021, answer due 1/5/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nicole Stauss - Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Continental Service Group Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joshua C Hull, (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joshua C Hull. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joshua C Hull. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32435481 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Joshua C Hull. (Attorney Nicholas M. Wajda added to party Joshua C Hull(pty:pla))(Wajda, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Joshua Hull v. Continental Service Group Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua C Hull | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas M. Wajda |
| Represented By: | Nicholas M Wajda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Continental Service Group Inc doing business as Conserve | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
