Jose Manuel Galan v. Kathleen Allison
Jose Manuel Galan |
Kathleen Allison |
8:2021cv02019 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Christina A Snyder |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: granting #6 MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File. The time in which to file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is extended until March 2, 2022. (hr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by respondent Kathleen Allison. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Jacobson, Lise) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lise S Jacobson counsel for Respondent Kathleen Allison. Adding Lise Simons Jacobson as counsel of record for Kathleen Allison, Secretary for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by respondent Kathleen Allison, Secretary. (Attorney Lise S Jacobson added to party Kathleen Allison(pty:res))(Jacobson, Lise) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. That Respondent Kathleen Allison file Answer to the Petition not later than 1/31/2022. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 1/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Election re Consent, #3 CV-11B) (mba) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Jose Manuel Galan. (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early.(Filing Fee $5 Due), filed by Petitioner Jose Manuel Galan. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jose Manuel Galan v. Kathleen Allison | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jose Manuel Galan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Kathleen Allison | |
Represented By: | Lise S Jacobson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.