Haynes Holding Group LLC v. ESR Performance Corp. et al
| Joshua Haynes Haynes Holding Group LLC and Haynes Holding Group LLC |
| ESR Performance Corp. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 8:2021cv02033 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 3/7/2022 at 11:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 2/28/2022. (lb)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): Case number and judge's initials are not indicated in the caption of the attached document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 10 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Haynes Holding Group LLC. (Acherman, Saul) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, Attachment # 3 Summons and Attachment # 4 Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant ESR Performance Corp. (et) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:21-cv-02033-JVS (JDEx). (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32456381 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Joshua Haynes Haynes Holding Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Saul Acherman added to party Joshua Haynes Haynes Holding Group LLC(pty:pla))(Acherman, Saul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
