Gloire Mwaka Kanda v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Gloire Kanda Kanda and Gloire Mwaka Kanda |
| UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and KATHY BARAN |
| 8:2021cv02040 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gloire Mwaka Kanda, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C Torres. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Eddie Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to K Lusby. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Mail Receipts)(Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants Kathy Baran, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lom) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gloire Mwaka Kanda. (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #7 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. The date and signature line must be left blank. Please add next to case number the Judge's initials. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lom) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gloire Mwaka Kanda. (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney James O. Hacking, III. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gloire Kanda Kanda. (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gloire Kanda Kanda, (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32467893 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Gloire Kanda Kanda. (Attorney Marc A Karlin added to party Gloire Kanda Kanda(pty:pla))(Karlin, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
