Shada Marie Patterson v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Shada Marie Patterson
Defendant: Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Does 1 to 100, Inclusive
Case Number: 8:2021cv02125
Filed: December 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2022 Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan -Amended ; estimated length of trial 3-4 Days, filed by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex.A - Proposed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Michail, Maureen)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDERING COUNSEL TO REVIEW LOCAL PROCEDURES by Judge Josephine L. Staton: No later than 2/25/202. counsel shall file an Amended Joint Rule 26(f) Report with a fully completed Exhibit A. The Court the Scheduling Conference to 3/4/2022 at 10:30 AM. (See document for further information). (jp)
February 7, 2022 Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-4 Days, filed by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company.. (Michail, Maureen)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 2/18/2022 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
December 29, 2021 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
December 29, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
December 29, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
December 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap)
December 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:21-cv-02125 JLS (JDEx). (ghap)
December 28, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF AMENDED COMPLAINT amending Complaint - (Discovery), the plaintiff having designated a defendant in the complaint by the incorrect name of USAA Causalty Insurance Company and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, filed by plaintiff Shada Marie Patterson. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/13/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap)
December 28, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 100, Inclusive, Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Shada Marie Patterson. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/8/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
December 28, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/23/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
December 28, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant GARRISON PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on December 28, 2021. (Michail, Maureen)
December 28, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GARRISON PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, (Michail, Maureen)
December 28, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant GARRISON PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Michail, Maureen)
December 28, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01225383-CU-BC-NJC Receipt No: ACACDC-32538361 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant GARRISON PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Complaint and Proof of Service, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Amendment to Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. C - Garrison Property & Casualty Ins. Co. Answer to Complaint; Demand for Jury Trial) (Attorney Maureen M Michail added to party GARRISON PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY(pty:dft))(Michail, Maureen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shada Marie Patterson v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shada Marie Patterson
Represented By: Marc Philip Grismer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Maureen M Michail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?