Michael Miller v. Segerstrom Center for the Arts
| Michael Miller |
| Sergestrom Center for the Arts and Segerstrom Center for the Arts |
| 8:2022cv00056 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts, served on March 10, 2022. (Palpallatoc, Pamela) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on May 26, 2022. (rrp) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6)] filed by Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts. Motion set for hearing on 4/25/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1 to Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #3 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint) (Attorney Pamela Palpallatoc added to party Segerstrom Center for the Arts(pty:dft)) (Palpallatoc, Pamela) |
| Filing 11 Court 1 - FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Under the Americans with Disabilities Act against Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts amending Complaint - (Discovery), #1 , filed by plaintiff Michael Miller(twdb) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael Miller, upon Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts served on 2/3/2022, answer due 2/24/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Brian Finck, CFO in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Original Summons NOT returned. (twdb) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Segerstrom Center for the Arts. (kh) |
Filing 8
ORDER RE PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (eva)
|
| Filing 7 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 into the registry of the Court from Michael Miller. Re: Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #6 . Receipt number SA017641. (dta) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. (lom)
|
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) filed by Plaintiff Michael Miller. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Sergestrom Center for the Arts. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Michael Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
