Kha Huy T. Nguyen v. Lieu Thu Trinh
| Kha Huy T. Nguyen |
| Lieu Thu T. Trinh |
| 8:2022cv00095 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case #4 . (twdb)
|
| Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #4 REQUEST for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (twdb) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error docket item #3 was issued with the incorrect filed date. Item 3 should be disregarded, a corrected summonswith the date of 1/11/2022 will be issued (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car) |
| Filing 3 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 1/20/2022, SEE ITEM 8] 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Lieu Thu T. Trinh. (car) Modified on 1/20/2022 (car). |
| Filing 9 CORRECTED 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Lieu Thu T. Trinh. (car) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Kha Huy T. Nguyen. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kha Huy T. Nguyen (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Lieu Thu T. Trinh. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth.(Filing fee $ 402 PAID), filed by Plaintiff Kha Huy T. Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kha Huy T. Nguyen v. Lieu Thu Trinh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kha Huy T. Nguyen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lieu Thu T. Trinh | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
