Jeanette Betancourt v. American Income Life Insurance Company et al
| Jeanette Betancourt |
| American Income Life Insurance Company, Does 1-10, Inclusive, and Does 1-10. inclusive |
| 8:2022cv00153 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Joint Stipulation to Further Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint #14 . The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended forth-five days from March 30, 2022 to May 16, 2022. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #14 . Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company answer due 5/16/2022. (twdb)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cortina, Samuel) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to American Income Life Insurance Company answer now due 3/30/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company.(Cortina, Samuel) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company, identifying Globe Life Inc.. (Cortina, Samuel) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Samuel C. Cortina counsel for Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company. Filed by Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company. (Attorney Samuel C. Cortina added to party American Income Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Cortina, Samuel) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Albert Q Giang counsel for Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company. Filed by Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company. (Attorney Albert Q Giang added to party American Income Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Giang, Albert) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (kd)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant American Income Life Insurance Company. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff Jeanette Betancourt. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jeanette Betancourt, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jeanette Betancourt. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32703517 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Jeanette Betancourt. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Jeanette Betancourt(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
