Christopher Scott Robertson v. BMW of North America, LLC
Plaintiff: Christopher Scott Robertson
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
Case Number: 8:2022cv00242
Filed: February 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 5/13/2022 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT FOR GOOD CAUSE, AND TO GRANT BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC LEAVE TO FILE ITS ANSWER (Doc. #23 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton that (1) The Court finds good cause to set aside default entered against BMW of North America, LLC #17 , and hereby sets default aside. (2) The Court grants BMW of North America, LLC leave to file an Answer, and accepts the answer filed on March 21, 2022 (Doc. #18 ) as filed. (jp)
March 23, 2022 Filing 24 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
March 22, 2022 Filing 23 Joint STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to Defendant BMW of North America, LLC filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rotman, Amy)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer to Complaint #18 , for the following reasons: Clerk entered default against defendant on 4/15/21. Once default is entered, a defendant is not permitted to file an answer. Defendant must first file a stipulation or noticed motion seeking relief from default. Counsel must comply with Local Rules and Judge Staton's Procedures. (jp)
March 21, 2022 Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Default on file dated 3/16/2022 (Dkt. No. #17 ) as to Defendant BMW of North America, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (2) Leave of court required for filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
March 21, 2022 Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, identifying (a)Defendant BMW of North America, LLC; (b)Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson; (c)BMW of San Luis Obispo; (d)Crevier BMW; (e)BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; (f)BMW (US) Holding Corp; and (g)BMW AG.. (Amir, Abtin)
March 21, 2022 Filing 19 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Abtin Amir on behalf of Defendant BMW of North America, LLC (Amir, Abtin)
March 21, 2022 Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC.(Attorney Abtin Amir added to party BMW of North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Amir, Abtin). Modified on 3/22/2022 (jp). [DOCUMENT AS FILED PER ORDER DATED ON 3/29/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #25 ]. Modified on 3/29/2022 (jp).
March 16, 2022 Filing 17 [DOCUMENT SET ASIDE PER ORDER DATED ON 3/29/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #25 ] - DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant BMW of North America, LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability Company. (jp). Modified on 3/29/2022 (jp).
March 15, 2022 Filing 16 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant BMW of North America, LLC filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amy R. Rotman) (Rotman, Amy)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than 3/22/2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See document for further information). (jp)
March 7, 2022 Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Judge Josephine L. Staton - Effective Monday, March 21, 2022, Judge Josephine L. Staton will be located in the First Street U.S. Courthouse, Courtroom 8A, on the 8th floor, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 8A of the First Street U.S. Courthouse unless otherwise ordered by the Court. For additional information regarding mandatory chambers copies and the use of Zoom hearings in civil matters, please refer to Judge Staton's Procedures & Schedules Page on the Court's website: https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-josephine-l-staton. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cbr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 22, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson. (Rotman, Amy)
February 22, 2022 Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Complaint #1 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #9 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **March 1, 2022.** Failure to do so may result in sanctions and/or the action being DISMISSED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 18, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson, upon Defendant BMW of North America, LLC served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent of Service of Process, CT Corporation, Daisy Montenegro, Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons returned. (Wirtz, Richard)
February 17, 2022 Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku)
February 16, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil)
February 16, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (jtil)
February 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson, identifying Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson, Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Wirtz, Richard)
February 16, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
February 16, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
February 16, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil)
February 15, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson. (Wirtz, Richard)
February 15, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson. (Wirtz, Richard)
February 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32797890 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Scott Robertson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Richard M Wirtz added to party Christopher Scott Robertson(pty:pla))(Wirtz, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christopher Scott Robertson v. BMW of North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Scott Robertson
Represented By: Richard M Wirtz
Represented By: Amy Rebecca Rotman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BMW of North America, LLC
Represented By: Abtin Amir
Represented By: Ivana Bolcheva Saddigh
Represented By: Madeleine Messinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?