The Regents of the University of California v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc. et al
| The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of University of California, Irvine Medical Center and The Regents of the University of California |
| Government Employees Health Association, Inc. and DOES 1-25, inclusive |
| 8:2022cv00292 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff The Regents of the University of California. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Hapak, Christopher) |
Filing 13
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT, #12 , by Judge David O. Carter: The Court rules as follows: Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint is continued from April 1, 2022 to May 2, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to May 2, 2022 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zorkin, Michael) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Government Employees Health Association, Inc. answer now due 4/1/2022, filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc..(Zorkin, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 8:22-cv-00292-DOC-(KESx). (dve)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff The Regents of the University of California in Orange County Superior Court on 12/1/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice (Other) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on February 24, 2022. (Zorkin, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Notice to Adverse Parties filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc.. (Zorkin, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc., (Zorkin, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc.. (Zorkin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01234280-cu-bc-cxc Receipt No: ACACDC-32844035 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Government Employees Health Association, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons, #3 Exhibit Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit ADR Packet, #5 Declaration Declaration of Aguilar Thompson, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 6) (Attorney Michael Zorkin added to party Government Employees Health Association, Inc. (pty:dft))(Zorkin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Regents of the University of California v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of University of California, Irvine Medical Center | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Regents of the University of California | |
| Represented By: | David Frank Mastan |
| Represented By: | Melanie Joy Stephenson-Laws |
| Represented By: | Richard A Lovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Government Employees Health Association, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Zorkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOES 1-25, inclusive | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
