Danny Han v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Danny Han
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2022cv00380
Filed: March 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF DANNY HAN #15 by Judge David O. Carter. Based thereon, judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff Danny Han and against Defendant Reliance Standard in accordance with Rules 55, 58 and 79 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in the principal amount of $235,313 for Mr. Han's damages, plus prejudgment interest at the legal rate of 10% per annum from October 15, 2018 through April 28, 2022 of $27,829, plus Mr. Han's reasonable attorneys' fees of $83,505, plus costs in the amount of $501.98, which were proven to the Court as part of Mr. Han's Application for Default Judgment, for a total default judgment amount of $347,148.98. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)
April 28, 2022 Filing 15 APPLICATION for Entry of Default against Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company filed by Plaintiff Danny Han. Application set for hearing on 6/6/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert J. McKennon, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Declaration of Cory T. Salisbury, #10 Exhibit 1, #11 Exhibit 2, #12 Exhibit 3, #13 Exhibit 4, #14 Exhibit 5, #15 Exhibit 6, #16 Exhibit 7, #17 Exhibit 8, #18 Exhibit 9, #19 Declaration of Danny Han, #20 Proposed Order) (McKennon, Robert)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/28/2022. (twdb)
April 21, 2022 Filing 13 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (twdb)
April 20, 2022 Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company filed by Plaintiff Danny Han. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cory T. Salisbury) (McKennon, Robert)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/23/2022.) (twdb)
March 23, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Danny Han, upon Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/12/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, person authorized to accept service in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (McKennon, Robert)
March 18, 2022 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu)
March 10, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (lh)
March 10, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
March 10, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
March 10, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh)
March 10, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff Danny Han. (McKennon, Robert)
March 10, 2022 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Danny Han, (McKennon, Robert)
March 10, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Danny Han. (McKennon, Robert)
March 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32928491 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Danny Han. (Attorney Robert J McKennon added to party Danny Han(pty:pla))(McKennon, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Danny Han v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Han
Represented By: Robert J McKennon
Represented By: Cory T Salisbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?