Hadi Mohammady v. Zodiac Solutions et al
| Hadi Mohammady |
| Zodiac Solutions AKA Zodiac Solutions, Inc., Wipro Limited, incorrectly sued as Wipro Technologies AKA Wipro Technologies, Inc., Alcon Research, LLC, incorrectly sued as Alcon Laboratories, Inc. AKA Alcon Labs, Zodiac Solutions, Wipro Limited, Alcon Research, LLC, Zodiac Solutions, Inc., Wipro Technologies, Inc., Alcon Labs and Does 1 to 20, inclusive |
| 8:2022cv00404 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (See attached Order for complete details.) (dca)
|
| Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:22-cv-00404-DOC-(JDEx). (dve)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Declaration Declaration of David Cheng in Support of Removal, 2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet are attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hadi Mohammady, upon Defendant Zodiac Solutions served on 2/11/2022, answer due 3/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jourdan Cerillo, Authorized to Accept in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/16/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hadi Mohammady, upon Defendant Wipro Limited served on 2/14/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Inc., Registered Agent, By Serving Sarai Marin, Process Intake Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/15/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Alcon Research, LLC, Does 1 to 20, inclusive, Wipro Limited, Zodiac Solutions. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Hadi Mohammady. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/20/2022 SUMBITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Wipro Limited. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/16/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Alcon Research, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/14/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hadi Mohammady, upon Defendant Alcon Research, LLC served on 2/11/2022, answer due 3/4/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation Service Company, Registered Agent, By Servicing Koy Saechao, Service of Process Intake Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/15/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Compliance Re Removal filed by Defendant Wipro Limited, incorrectly sued as Wipro Technologies AKA Wipro Technologies, Inc.. (Cheng, David) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Alcon Research, LLC, incorrectly sued as Alcon Laboratories, Inc. AKA Alcon Labs identifying none as Corporate Parent. (Cheng, David) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Wipro Limited, incorrectly sued as Wipro Technologies AKA Wipro Technologies, Inc. identifying none as Corporate Parent. (Cheng, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior, West Justice Center, case number 30-2022-01241684-CU-OE-WJC Receipt No: ACACDC-32956261 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Wipro Limited, incorrectly sued as Wipro Technologies AKA Wipro Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of David Cheng in Support of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney David L Cheng added to party Wipro Limited, incorrectly sued as Wipro Technologies AKA Wipro Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Cheng, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
