Constance A. Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Constance A. Moore
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 8:2022cv00423
Filed: March 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2022 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Constance A. Moore, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 3/24/2022, answer due 6/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Emily Sase. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to illegible. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Monge, Troy)
April 1, 2022 Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attorney Jennifer Lee Tarn added to party Commissioner of Social Security Administration(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.] (san)
March 18, 2022 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (rolm)
March 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (rolm)
March 18, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff Constance A Moore. (Monge, Troy)
March 18, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Constance A Moore, (Monge, Troy)
March 18, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Constance A Moore. (Monge, Troy)
March 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32974397 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Constance A Moore. (Attorney Troy Dana Monge added to party Constance A Moore(pty:pla))(Monge, Troy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Constance A. Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance A. Moore
Represented By: Troy Dana Monge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney SA-CV
Represented By: Jennifer Lee Tarn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?