Kristina Khederlarian v. Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company
Kristina Khederlarian |
Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company |
8:2022cv00435 |
March 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
John F Walter |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Samuel J. Strauss to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33392201) filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (King, Bradley) |
|
Filing 19 Amended STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 25, 2022 filed by Defendant Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of P. Craig Cardon, #2 Proposed Order)(Cardon, P) |
|
Filing 17 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 25, 2022 filed by Defendant Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cardon, P) |
Filing 16 DECLARATION of Lead Trial Counsel P. Craig Cardon filed by Defendant Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company. (Cardon, P) |
Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company answer now due 5/18/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company.(Attorney P Craig Cardon added to party Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company(pty:dft))(Cardon, P) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian, upon Defendant Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jaclyn Marci, Legal Secretary in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Wolfson, Tina) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Bradley K. King re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #11 Declaration of Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian. (King, Bradley) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian. Related Case(s): 2:22-cv-01784-JFW-GJS (Wolfson, Tina) |
|
|
Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company. (car) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian, identifying Kristina Khederlarian, Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company. (Wolfson, Tina) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian. (Wolfson, Tina) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian. (Wolfson, Tina) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32984563 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Kristina Khederlarian. (Attorney Tina Wolfson added to party Kristina Khederlarian(pty:pla))(Wolfson, Tina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.