Dean Manes v. Dinah Manning et al
Dean Manes and Dean Edward Manes |
Dinah Manning and Federal Public Defender |
8:2022cv00465 |
March 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
James V Selna |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Dispute of Order filed by plaintiff Dean Edward Manes. (es) Modified on 5/3/2022 (es). |
Filing 7 NOTICE filed by plaintiff Dean Manes. (es) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge James V. Selna: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. Denying #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. [See Order for details.] MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (es) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Dean Manes. (car) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel filed by Plaintiff Dean Manes. (car) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, filed by Plaintiff Dean Manes. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.