C.J. Segerstrom and Sons v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS and C.J. Segerstrom and Sons
Defendant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 8:2022cv00466
Filed: March 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2022 Filing 17 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 10, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Lexington Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Martin, Justin)
May 11, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, identifying Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Inc.; Starr Companies, Inc.. (Buetzow, Eric)
May 5, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Lexington Insurance Company, (Martin, Justin)
April 28, 2022 Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company answer now due 5/31/2022, filed by Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company.(Attorney Eric W Buetzow added to party Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Buetzow, Eric)
April 27, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Lexington Insurance Company answer now due 5/27/2022, filed by Defendant Lexington Insurance Company.(Attorney Justin Alan Martin added to party Lexington Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Martin, Justin)
April 14, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff C.J. Segerstrom and Sons, upon Defendant Lexington Insurance Company served on 4/8/2022, answer due 4/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Hillary Agnost, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entitya.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Kayla)
April 8, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff C.J. Segerstrom and Sons, upon Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Legal Department in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Robinson, Kayla)
March 30, 2022 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (car)
March 30, 2022 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
March 30, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
March 30, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Lexington Insurance Company. (car)
March 30, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car)
March 29, 2022 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS (Crosner, Shaun)
March 29, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS. (Crosner, Shaun)
March 29, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS. (Crosner, Shaun)
March 29, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS. (Crosner, Shaun)
March 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33025500 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Shaun Hamilton Crosner added to party C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS(pty:pla))(Crosner, Shaun)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: C.J. Segerstrom and Sons v. Lexington Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C.J. SEGERSTROM & SONS
Represented By: Shaun Hamilton Crosner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C.J. Segerstrom and Sons
Represented By: Kayla Robinson
Represented By: Shaun Hamilton Crosner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Justin Alan Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Eric W Buetzow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?