Raul Torres Sanchez v. City of Buena Park et al
Plaintiff: Raul Torres Sanchez
Defendant: City of Buena Park, City of Anaheim and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2022cv00769
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: James V Selna
2 Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchezto Order to Show Cause,,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines,,, #16 (Order to Show Cause Re Staying Case; Dismissal of Federal Claims; and Remanding Action) (Contreras, Christian)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] Order to Show Cause Re Staying Case; Dismissalof Federal Claims; and Remanding Action by Judge James V. Selna: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez toshow cause, no later than June 6, 2022, why the Court should not: 1) stay the action pending resolution of the criminal proceedings against Plaintiff in superior court; 2) sua sponte dismiss the federal claims and allegations pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) as described by Defendant in its Reply, Dkt. No. 15 at 2; or allow Sanchez to file an amended complaint deleting all claims upon which federal jurisdiction is predicated; 3) upon dismissal and/or removal of the federal claims and allegations, remand the case back to state court. The hearing set for May 23, 2022 is continued to June 13, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. (es)
May 9, 2022 Filing 15 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief can be Granted; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Judicial Notice; NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Case Pending Conclusion of Related Criminal Case #10 filed by Defendant City of Anaheim. (Johnson, Moses)
May 5, 2022 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant City of Anaheim, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 served on 05/05/2022. (Johnson, Moses)
May 2, 2022 Filing 13 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief can be Granted; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Judicial Notice; NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Case Pending Conclusion of Related Criminal Case #10 filed by Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez. (Contreras, Christian)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 6/27/2022 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 6/17/2022. (lb)
April 25, 2022 Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Christian M Contreras counsel for Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez. Adding Christian Contreras as counsel of record for Raul Torres Sanchez for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez. (Attorney Christian M Contreras added to party Raul Torres Sanchez(pty:pla))(Contreras, Christian)
April 25, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief can be Granted; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Request for Judicial Notice;, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Case Pending Conclusion of Related Criminal Case filed by Defendant City of Anaheim. Motion set for hearing on 5/23/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order) (Johnson, Moses)
April 22, 2022 Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
April 21, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-00769 JVS(JDEx). (rn)
April 19, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Anaheim answer now due 5/25/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant City of Anaheim.(Johnson, Moses)
April 15, 2022 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Humberto M Guizar counsel for Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez. Adding Humberto M. Guizar as counsel of record for Raul Torres Sanchez for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez. (Attorney Humberto M Guizar added to party Raul Torres Sanchez(pty:pla))(Guizar, Humberto)
April 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh)
April 6, 2022 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant City Of Anaheim, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 served on 04/06/2022. (Johnson, Moses)
April 6, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City Of Anaheim. (Johnson, Moses)
April 6, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City Of Anaheim, identifying City of Anaheim. (Johnson, Moses)
April 6, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01231449 with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 04/06/2022, receipt number 33081838), filed by Defendant City Of Anaheim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Summons) (Attorney Moses W Johnson, IV added to party City Of Anaheim(pty:dft))(Johnson, Moses)
April 6, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Anaheim, City of Buena Park, Does, filed by Plaintiff Raul Torres Sanchez. (FILED IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/12/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raul Torres Sanchez v. City of Buena Park et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raul Torres Sanchez
Represented By: Gary Dordick
Represented By: Alaa A Yasin
Represented By: Christian M Contreras
Represented By: Humberto M Guizar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Buena Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Anaheim
Represented By: Moses W Johnson, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?