Mario Bryant Avalos v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Mario Bryant Avalos
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number: 8:2022cv00787
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2022 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nathan Andrew Searles counsel for Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. Filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (Attorney Nathan Andrew Searles added to party Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC(pty:dft))(Searles, Nathan)
June 2, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.(Attorney Jeffrey A Topor added to party Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC(pty:dft))(Topor, Jeffrey)
May 27, 2022 Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Mario Bryant Avalos. (Veggian, Lauren)
May 27, 2022 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mario Bryant Avalos, upon Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC served on 5/17/2022, answer due 6/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Koy Saechao, Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Veggian, Lauren)
April 11, 2022 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (sh)
April 11, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh)
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mario Bryant Avalos, (Cardoza, Michael)
April 8, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mario Bryant Avalos. (Cardoza, Michael)
April 8, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mario Bryant Avalos. (Cardoza, Michael)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33101982 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Mario Bryant Avalos. (Attorney Michael Frederick Cardoza added to party Mario Bryant Avalos(pty:pla))(Cardoza, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mario Bryant Avalos v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Bryant Avalos
Represented By: Michael Frederick Cardoza
Represented By: Lauren B Veggian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Represented By: Nathan Andrew Searles
Represented By: Jeffrey A Topor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?