Maryam Alizadeh v. Chip Laitinen et al
| Maryam Alizadeh |
| Chip Laitinen and Richard C. Visek |
| 8:2022cv00864 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Richard C. Visek answer now due 8/1/2022; Chip Laitinen answer now due 8/1/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Richard C. Visek; Chip Laitinen.(Attorney Erin G. Choi added to party Chip Laitinen(pty:dft), Attorney Erin G. Choi added to party Richard C. Visek(pty:dft))(Choi, Erin) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maryam Alizadeh, upon Defendant Richard C. Visek served on 5/2/2022, answer due 7/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Maryam Alizadeh, upon Defendant Chip Laitinen served on 5/2/2022, answer due 7/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Chip Laitinen, Richard C. Visek. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Maryam Alizadeh, (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Maryam Alizadeh. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Maryam Alizadeh. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33182304 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Maryam Alizadeh. (Attorney Joshua L. Goldstein added to party Maryam Alizadeh(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
