Tengteng Yu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
| Tengteng Yu |
| AJELANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Rosemary Langley Melville, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| Tingting Yu |
| 8:2022cv00878 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tengteng Yu, upon Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 5/17/2022, answer due 7/18/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 5/17/2022, answer due 7/18/2022; Rosemary Langley Melville served on 5/17/2022, answer due 7/18/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/17/2022, answer due 7/18/2022; United States Department of Homeland Security served on 5/17/2022, answer due 7/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Processing Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Processing Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Department of Homeland Security. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:22-cv-00878 FLA(ADSx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge James V. Selna. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge James V. Selna to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:22-cv-00878-RSWL(ADSx). (dta)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Rosemary Langley Melville, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. (sh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Tengteng Yu. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tengteng Yu. (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Tengteng Yu, (Fan, Zhenxiong) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33193251 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Tengteng Yu. (Attorney Zhenxiong Fan added to party Tengteng Yu(pty:pla))(Fan, Zhenxiong) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
