Brian Horowitz v. International E-Z Up, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Horowitz
Defendant: International E-Z Up, Inc.
Petitioner: Brian Horowitz, -
Case Number: 8:2022cv00951
Filed: May 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-00951 AB(MRWx). (rn)
June 29, 2022 Filing 14 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Counterclaim, #11 Answer to International E-Z Up's Counterclaim with Proof of Service filed by Plaintiff & Counter Defendant Brian Horowitz.(Forsythe, Marc)
June 13, 2022 Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Counter Claimant International E-Z Up, Inc., Defendant International E-Z Up, Inc. (Wilton, Kenneth)
June 13, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant International E-Z Up, Inc., identifying Brian Horowitz as Plaintiff and International E-Z Up, Inc. as Defendant. (Wilton, Kenneth)
June 13, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , COUNTERCLAIM against Brian Horowitz filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant International E-Z Up, Inc..(Attorney Kenneth L. Wilton added to party International E-Z Up, Inc.(pty:dft))(Wilton, Kenneth)
June 8, 2022 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz, upon Defendant International E-Z Up, Inc. served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Paracorp Incorporated, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Forsythe, Marc)
May 11, 2022 Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
May 10, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Darrell W. Gibby on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
May 10, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (et)
May 10, 2022 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant International E-Z Up, Inc. (et)
May 10, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et)
May 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz, (Forsythe, Marc)
May 9, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
May 9, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Brian Horowitz. (Forsythe, Marc)
May 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-33266697 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Brian Horowitz. (Attorney Marc C. Forsythe added to party Brian Horowitz(pty:mov))(Forsythe, Marc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Horowitz v. International E-Z Up, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian Horowitz, -
Represented By: Marc C. Forsythe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: International E-Z Up, Inc.
Represented By: Ashley N Smith
Represented By: Kenneth L. Wilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Horowitz
Represented By: Marc C. Forsythe
Represented By: Darrell W. Gibby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?