Randall Harris et al v. Broker Solutions, Inc. et al
| Randall Harris and Nichole Harris |
| Broker Solutions, Inc., d/b/a New American Funding, Does 1-10 and Broker Solutions, Inc. doing business as New American Funding |
| 8:2022cv01023 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on August 25, 2022. (rrp) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc..(Ramos, James) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc..(Attorney James J Ramos added to party Broker Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ramos, James) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Randall Harris, Nichole Harris, upon Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc. served on 5/27/2022, answer due 6/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kenneth Block, Officer in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Raymond) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Broker Solutions, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiffs Nichole Harris, Randall Harris, identifying Randall Harris, Nichole Harris, Broker Solutions, Inc., d/b/a New American Funding. (Kim, Raymond) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Nichole Harris, Randall Harris. (Kim, Raymond) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Nichole Harris, Randall Harris. (Kim, Raymond) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33334792 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiffs Randall Harris, Nichole Harris. (Attorney Raymond Yoon Ho Kim added to party Nichole Harris(pty:pla), Attorney Raymond Yoon Ho Kim added to party Randall Harris(pty:pla))(Kim, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
