James V. Lacy et al v. United States Department of State
Plaintiff: James V. Lacy and United States Justice Foundation
Defendant: United States Department of State and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2022cv01065
Filed: May 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2022 Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kdu)
May 27, 2022 Filing 9 30 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United States Department of State. (car)
May 27, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
May 27, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
May 27, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car)
May 26, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Morgan, Chad)
May 26, 2022 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiffs James V. Lacy, United States Justice Foundation (Morgan, Chad)
May 26, 2022 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs James V. Lacy, United States Justice Foundation. (Morgan, Chad)
May 26, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff James V. Lacy, United States Justice Foundation. (Morgan, Chad)
May 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33370341 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff James V. Lacy, United States Justice Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits) (Attorney Chad D Morgan added to party James V. Lacy(pty:pla), Attorney Chad D Morgan added to party United States Justice Foundation(pty:pla))(Morgan, Chad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James V. Lacy et al v. United States Department of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James V. Lacy
Represented By: Chad D Morgan
Represented By: Alexander Emanuel Tomescu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Justice Foundation
Represented By: Chad D Morgan
Represented By: Alexander Emanuel Tomescu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?