Kevin Lopez v. Sonesta International Hotels Corporation et al
| Kevin Lopez |
| Sonesta International Hotels Corporation and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 8:2022cv01212 |
| June 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen E. Scott. New Case Number 8:22-cv-1212 JWH (KESx). (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation identifying Sonesta International Hotels Corporation is owned by Sonesta Holdco Corporation. 34% of Sonesta Holdco Corporation is owned by Services Properties Trust, which is a publicly traded company. The other owners are Adam Portnoy, Diane Portnoy Trust, and SVC Holdings LLC. as Corporate Parent. (Thomas, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation, identifying Sonesta Holdco Corporation, a Maryland corporation, owns Sonesta International Hotels Corporation; 2.Defendant, SONESTA INTERNATIONAL HOTELS CORPORATION; and Plaintiff, KEVIN LOPEZ. (Thomas, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation. (Thomas, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2022-01254142 Receipt No: ACACDC-33521950 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration In Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A-D to Michael D. Thomas' Declaration, #3 Declaration In Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Michael D. Thomas added to party Sonesta International Hotels Corporation(pty:dft))(Thomas, Michael) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/22/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, inclusive, Sonesta International Hotels Corporation. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Kevin Lopez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/11/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Kevin Lopez, upon Defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 5/25/2022, answer due 6/15/2022. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Ashley E. Kang, Attorney for defendant Sonesta International Hotels Corporation. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/15/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
