Richard Gregory v. Jennifer Armstrong et al
Plaintiff: Richard Gregory
Defendant: Jennifer Armstrong, Jennifer Armstrong, M.D., P.C., Advanced Skincare Medcenter, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2022cv01234
Filed: June 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: Fred W Slaughter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2022 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory, upon Defendant Advanced Skincare Medcenter, Inc. served on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeffrey Benice, Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. NOTICE OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, and COMPLAINT ON ADVANCED SKINCARE MEDCENTER, INC. (Cameron-Banks, Indira)
August 27, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory, upon Defendant Jennifer Armstrong, M.D., P.C. served on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeffrey Benice, Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. NOTICE OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, and COMPLAINT ON JENNIFER ARMSTRONG, M.D., P.C. (Cameron-Banks, Indira)
August 27, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory, upon Defendant Jennifer Armstrong served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cynthia, Office Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. NOTICE OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, and COMPLAINT ON JENNIFER ARMSTRONG, M.D. (Cameron-Banks, Indira)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
June 30, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Civil Cover Sheet. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
June 30, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Advanced Skincare Medcenter, Inc., Jennifer Armstrong, Jennifer Armstrong, M.D., P.C. (ghap)
June 30, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
June 30, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
June 30, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap)
June 29, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory, (Jones, Terrence)
June 29, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory. (Jones, Terrence)
June 29, 2022 Filing 2 PETITION Civil Cover Sheet with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 06/29/2022, receipt number 33552052), filed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory. (Attorney Terrence Matthew Jones added to party Richard Gregory(pty:pla))(Jones, Terrence)
June 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33552052 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Richard Gregory. (Attorney Indira J Cameron-Banks added to party Richard Gregory(pty:pla))(Cameron-Banks, Indira)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Gregory v. Jennifer Armstrong et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Gregory
Represented By: Terrence Matthew Jones
Represented By: Indira J Cameron-Banks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Armstrong, M.D., P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Skincare Medcenter, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?