Adam Ghadiri v. Belts Drives LTD et al.
Adam Ghadiri |
Steven Yetzke, BELT DRIVES LTD and Belts Drives Ltd |
8:2022cv01238 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Belts Drives Ltd, Steven Yetzke. (Attachments: #1 Steven Yetzke) (sh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED SUMMONS)(Bakhos, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri, identifying BELT DRIVES LTD, a business entity; STEVEN YETZKE, an individual. (Bakhos, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33557637 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Adam Ghadiri. (Attorney Joseph Bakhos added to party Adam Ghadiri (pty:pla))(Bakhos, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.