Zahra Moradi v. Merrick B. Garland et al
Zahra Moradi |
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim and Christopher A. Wray |
8:2022cv01255 |
July 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Zahra Moradi. (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A. Wray. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Zahra Moradi. (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Zahra Moradi, (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zahra Moradi. (Anderson, Lisa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33570492 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Zahra Moradi. (Attorney Lisa S Anderson added to party Zahra Moradi(pty:pla))(Anderson, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.