Jose Gutierrez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Jose Gutierrez and Isabel Gutierrez |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10 |
| 8:2022cv01264 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| John D Early |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #26 Joint MOTION For Dismissal. It is hereby ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (twdb)
|
| Filing 26 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL) (Dolin, Tionna) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Stipulation #24 . Accordingly, the Court hereby enters an ORDER for Defendant to pay $11,000.00 to resolve Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses. Payment is to be made to counsel for Plaintiffs within 60 days of entry of this Order. (twdb)
|
| Filing 24 STIPULATION for Order pay filed by Plaintiffs Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dolin, Tionna) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Granting Joint Stipulation for Order to Continue Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Expenses and Jurisdiction #22 . The Court continues the filing deadline of Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Expenses from 9/4/23 to 10/4/23; and The Court retains Jurisdiction over the action until Plaintiffs' fees, costs, and expenses are decided and funding satisfied. (twdb)
|
| Filing 22 Joint STIPULATION for Order to Continue Jurisdiction filed by plaintiffs Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation For Order To Continue Plaintiffs Motion For Attorneys Fees, Costs, And Expenses And Jurisdiction)(Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Accordingly, the Court enters JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $82,746.87 pursuant to the terms of the Rule 68 Offer. Related to: REQUEST to Enforce Judgment #20 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb) |
| Filing 20 REQUEST to Enforce Judgment Entry of Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 68(a) filed by Plaintiffs Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Judgment) (Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Rabiya F. Tirmizi counsel for Plaintiffs Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. Adding Rabiya Tirmizi as counsel of record for Plaintiff for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jose Gutierrez and Isabel Gutierrez. (Attorney Rabiya F. Tirmizi added to party Isabel Gutierrez(pty:pla), Attorney Rabiya F. Tirmizi added to party Jose Gutierrez(pty:pla))(Tirmizi, Rabiya) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nino Sanaia counsel for Plaintiffs Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. Adding Nino Sanaia as counsel of record for Plaintiff for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Jose Gutierrez and Isabel Gutierrez. (Attorney Nino Sanaia added to party Isabel Gutierrez(pty:pla), Attorney Nino Sanaia added to party Jose Gutierrez(pty:pla))(Sanaia, Nino) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (rrp)
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Discovery cut-off 8/31/2023. LAST DATE TO HEAR MOTIONS is 10/30/2023. Last date to conduct settlement conference is 9/14/2023. Pretrial Conference set for 12/18/2023 at 3:00 p.m. Jury Trial set for 1/9/2024 at 8:30 a.m. (rrp)
|
| Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiffs Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez.. (Harman-Holmes, Ariel) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF INTENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on October 20, 2022. (rrp) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-01264 CJC(JDEx). (rn) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying BlackRock, Inc. and certain of its affiliates; The Vanguard Group and certain of its affiliates. (Gilefsky, Judd) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Attorney Judd A Gilefsky added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Gilefsky, Judd) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Gutierrez, Isabel Gutierrez, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 7/27/2022, answer due 8/17/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessue Gastelum, CT Corporation System, Inc., Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 as to Defendant Ford Motor Company. (es) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by plaintiff Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. (Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by plaintiff Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez. (Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Isabel Gutierrez, Jose Gutierrez, identifying FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 07/06/2022, receipt number 33582379), filed by plaintiff Jose Gutierrez, Isabel Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dolin, Tionna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33582379 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jose Gutierrez, Isabel Gutierrez. (Attorney Tionna Dolin added to party Isabel Gutierrez(pty:pla), Attorney Tionna Dolin added to party Jose Gutierrez(pty:pla))(Dolin, Tionna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
