Sarkis Tatarian v. City of La Palma
| Sarkis Tatarian |
| City of La Palma |
| 8:2022cv01265 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Respondent City of La Palma. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Thind, Ajit) |
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND FILE MOTION FOR REMAND, #14 by Judge James V. Selna. The Court, hereby orders as follows: That Respondent CITY OF LA PALMA shall have up to and including August 22, 2022, within which to respond to the Complaint in this action. That Petitioner SARKIS TATARIAN shall have up to and including August 22, 2022, to file a motion for remand. (es)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 22, 2022 re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days),, Petition (case opening), filed by Respondent City of La Palma. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Thind, Ajit) |
| Filing 13 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of La Palma answer now due 8/5/2022, re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days),, Petition (case opening), filed by Respondent City of La Palma.(Thind, Ajit) |
|
Filing 12
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 10/3/2022 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 9/26/2022. (lb)
|
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Amber Star Leal counsel for Respondent City of La Palma. Adding Amber Star Leal as counsel of record for City of La Palma for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent City of La Palma. (Leal, Amber) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 8:22-cv-01265-JVS-(DFMx). (dve)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of La Palma answer now due 7/29/2022, re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days),, Petition (case opening), filed by Respondent City of La Palma.(Thind, Ajit) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Respondent City of La Palma.(Thind, Ajit) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND PETITION Executed by Plaintiff Sarkis Tatarian, upon Defendant City of La Palma served on 6/9/2022, answer due 6/30/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kimberly Kennedy - City Clerk - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 6/10/2022 Submitted with Attachment 3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE (CCP 1085: DECLARATORY RELIEF; DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS (42 U.S.C. 1983); REGULATORY TAKING filed against City of La Palma, filed by Petitioner Sarkis Tatarian. Filed in State Court on 6/1/2022 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of La Palma, identifying Roger Clodt; Betty Clodt; James Strong; Mary Strong; William Dejager; Ceryl Dejager; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; Hrag Bakarian. (Thind, Ajit) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City of La Palma. (Thind, Ajit) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2022-01263112-CU-WM-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-33582835 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant City of La Palma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Attorney Ajit Singh Thind added to party City of La Palma(pty:dft))(Thind, Ajit) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sarkis Tatarian v. City of La Palma | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sarkis Tatarian | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of La Palma | |
| Represented By: | Ajit Singh Thind |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
