Weiss Surkhabi v. Tesla, Inc.
| Weiss Surkhabi |
| Tesla, Inc. Which Will Do Business In California As Tesla Motors, Inc. and Tesla, Inc. |
| 8:2022cv01315 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Tesla, Inc..(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Tesla, Inc..(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 14
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 10/17/2022 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 10/7/22. (lb)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tesla, Inc. answer now due 8/24/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Tesla, Inc..(Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Tesla, Inc.(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi, upon Defendant Tesla, Inc. served on 7/19/2022, answer due 8/9/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent of Service of Process - CT Corporation, Diana Ruiz, Process Specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons returned. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Tesla, Inc.. (es) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The Summons is addressed to BMW of North America, LLC. This Defendant is not on the caption of the complaint. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi, identifying Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi, Defendant Tesla, Inc.. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi. (Wirtz, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33630502 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Weiss Surkhabi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Richard M Wirtz added to party Weiss Surkhabi(pty:pla))(Wirtz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
