Robert Letskus, Jr. v. KVC Group, LLC et al
| Robert Letskus, Jr. |
| KVC Group, LLC doing business as National Credit Partners, Prime Legal Firm, Denise Ho and Kim Vo |
| 8:2022cv01381 |
| July 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fred W Slaughter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 66 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael E Sayer counsel for Defendant KVC Group, LLC. Adding Michael Sayer as counsel of record for KVC Group, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant KVC Group, LLC. (Attorney Michael E Sayer added to party KVC Group, LLC(pty:dft))(Sayer, Michael) |
| Filing 65 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Denise Ho counsel for Defendants Denise Ho, Prime Legal Firm. Adding Denise Ho as counsel of record for Denise Ho, an individual; and Prime Legal Firm for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Denise Ho. (Attorney Denise Ho added to party Denise Ho(pty:dft), Attorney Denise Ho added to party Prime Legal Firm(pty:dft))(Ho, Denise) |
| Filing 64 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jeffrey R. Hellman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 63 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Michael Andrew Zamat. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 62 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Gregory Peterson, Jr. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
Filing 61
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. Scheduling Conference set for 10/20/2022 at 9:00 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
|
Filing 60
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter. (mku)
|
| Filing 59 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 58 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 57 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fred W. Slaughter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 56 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 3:20-cv-01893, from USDC District of Connecticut, New Haven. The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 8:22-cv-01381-FWS-ADSx. (jtil) |
| Filing 55 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Connecticut |
| Filing 54 JUDGMENT entered transferring this action to the Central District of California. The Court leaves to the transferee district whether assignment of this case to the Santa Ana Division is appropriate.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 7/7/2022.(Bozek, M.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Bozek, M.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 53
ORDER granting in part #23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue. For the reasons described in the attached Ruling and Order, Defendants' motion to dismiss or transfer venue is GRANTED IN PART pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). The Clerk is directed to transfer this action to the Central District of California. The Court leaves to the transferee district whether assignment of this case to the Santa Ana Division is appropriate. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 07/06/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 52 RESPONSE re #51 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, #42 Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 51 Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue filed by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Peterson, Gregory) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 50
ORDER granting #49 Consent Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants may file a reply addressing any of the arguments in Plaintiff's responsive supplemental briefing, as set forth in the Court's Order dated January 26, 2022 (ECF No. 44), by March 9, 2022. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 02/22/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 49 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until March 9, 2022 To File Reply To Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief 48 Order on Motion for Extension of Time,, 40 Order,,, by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 48
ORDER granting #47 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Plaintiff to file responsive supplemental briefing, as set forth in the Court's Order dated January 26, 2022 (ECF No. 40), is hereby extended until February 23, 2022. Defendants may file a reply addressing any of the arguments in Plaintiff's responsive supplemental briefing by March 2, 2022. No further extensions of Plaintiff's deadline to file responsive supplemental briefing will be granted. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 02/17/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 47 MOTION for Extension of Time by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Peterson, Gregory) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 46 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 45
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #44 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Plaintiff to file responsive supplemental briefing, as set forth in the Court's Order dated January 26, 2022 (ECF No. 40), is hereby extended until February 16, 2022. Defendants may file a reply addressing any of the arguments in Plaintiff's responsive supplemental briefing by February 23, 2022. Plaintiff is reminded that all motions for extension of time shall strictly comply with Local Rule 7(b). Rule 7(b) provides, in part, that "[a]ll motions for extension of time shall be filed at least three (3) business days before the deadline sought to be extended, except in cases in which compelling circumstances warranting an extension arise during the three days before the deadline. Any motion for extension of time filed fewer than three business days before the deadline sought to be extended shall, in addition to satisfying all other requirements of this Rule, set forth reasons why the motion was not filed at least three business days before the deadline in question." Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 02/09/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 44 MOTION for Extension of Time by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Peterson, Gregory) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 43
ORDER. All nongovernmental corporate parties shall file disclosure statements, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, by February 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 02/08/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 42 Supplemental Memorandum in Support re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue filed by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Declaration of Kim Vo)(Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 41 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarala V. Nagala: Motion Hearing held on 1/26/2022 re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue filed by Kim Vo, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Denise Ho. Total Time: 1 hour and 15 minutes (Court Reporter: Corinne Thomas.) (Bozek, M.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 40
ORDER. By February 2, 2022, Defendants shall submit supplemental briefing addressing: (1) whether the Court retains subject matter jurisdiction over this action in light of Plaintiff's withdrawal of Count Four of the Second Amended Complaint; and (2) whether venue in this Court is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2). By February 9, 2022, Plaintiff shall file responsive supplemental briefing regarding these same issues. Plaintiff's responsive supplemental briefing shall also address any case law relating to whether a sole owner's entering into a contract on behalf of their company constitutes detrimental reliance for purposes of alleging fraud and negligent misrepresentation under both Connecticut and California law. By February 16, 2022, Defendants may file a reply addressing any of the arguments in Plaintiff's responsive supplemental briefing. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 01/26/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 39
CORRECTED ORDER. At the oral argument scheduled for January 26, 2022, on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue (ECF No. #23 ), the parties shall be prepared to address whether venue in this Court is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391, in light of Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court for Western District of Texas, 571 U.S. 49 (2013). [Case citation in ECF No. 38 corrected to remove pincite.] Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 01/25/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 38
ORDER. At the oral argument scheduled for January 26, 2022, on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue (ECF No. #23 ), the parties shall be prepared to address whether venue in this Court is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391, in light of Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court for Western District of Texas, 571 U.S. 49, 52 (2013). Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 01/25/2022. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| NOTICE regarding hearing via Zoom: The motion hearing scheduled for 1/26/2022 at 10:30 AM will be conducted via Zoom. The video link is https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1612488611?pwd=bWdsdkJkSjh3NEkzdXBXQTNPa2l0dz09 and call in numbers are 1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) or 1-646-828-7666 US (New York).Meeting ID: 161 248 8611 Meeting Password: 298008Please note: Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, screenshots, streaming, and rebroadcasting in any form, of court proceedings. The Judicial Conference of the United States, which governs the practices of the federal courts, has prohibited it. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. (Bozek, M.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 37 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion re: #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Motion Hearing set for 1/26/2022 at 10:30 AM in North Courtroom, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/22/2021.(Bozek, M.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 36 Joint STATUS REPORT by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 35
ORDER. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report within 14 days of the attached Order. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/06/2021. (Kuegler, Adam) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Peterson, Jr on behalf of Robert Letskus, Jr (Peterson, Gregory) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 33
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/15/21.(LaLone, L.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Sarala V. Nagala for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 11/15/2021.(Walker, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 31 REPLY to Response to #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue filed by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 30 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue. Reply due by 6/16/2021 (Freberg, B) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 29
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Defendants' #28 Consent Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED absent objection. Accordingly, Defendants must file their Reply to Plaintiff's #27 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss on or before June 16, 2021. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 4, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 28 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until 06/16/2021 for Defendants to file their Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss #27 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 27 First Memorandum in Opposition re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue filed by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Reset Deadlines as to #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue - Responses due by 5/26/2021 (Barry, Donna) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 26
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Plaintiff's #25 Motion on Consent for Extension of Time is GRANTED, absent objection and for good cause shown. Accordingly, Plaintiff must respond to Defendants' #23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue on or before May 26, 2021. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on May 19, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 25 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue until May 26, 2021 by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 24 Memorandum in Support re #23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue filed by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Emmie Mackey with Exhibit A, #2 Declaration of Denise Ho with Exhibit B)(Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint or Transfer Venue by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo.Responses due by 5/19/2021 (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint against Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo, filed by Robert Letskus, Jr.(Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Reset Deadlines: Amended Motion to Dismiss due by 4/28/2021 (Barry, Donna) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 21
ELECTRONIC ORDER finding as MOOT Defendants' #11 Motion to Dismiss in light of the Court's contemporaneously filed ORDER granting Defendants' #18 Consented to Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 19, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 20
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Defendants' #18 Consented to Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, absent objection and for good cause shown. Accordingly, Defendants must file their Amended Motion to Dismiss on or before April 28, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 19, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 19
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Plaintiff's #16 Motion on Consent for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 15(a) and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(f). The Court "should freely give leave when justice so requires." Fed R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Plaintiff states that the Second Amended Complaint will give Defendants a "better understanding of the claims being asserted against them" and "more specifically outline the allegations brought against each Defendant." Doc. #16 at 1. Accordingly, Plaintiff's proposed amendments are in the interest of justice. Pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(f), Plaintiff represents that Defendants consent to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff's Motion is accompanied by a redlined version of the proposed Second Amended Complaint against the operative #6 Amended Complaint. Although Plaintiff's Motion is not also accompanied by "a clean version of the proposed amended pleading," as required by D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(f), the Court has nonetheless considered it. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on April 19, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time until April 28, 2021 to file Amended Motion to Dismiss by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 17
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting, nunc pro tunc and absent objection, #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #11 provided on February 16, 2021 is hereby deemed timely. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 29, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 16 First MOTION to Amend/Correct for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Robert Letskus, Jr.Responses due by 4/13/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Second Amended Complaint)(Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Reset Deadlines as to #11 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction - Responses due by 3/23/2021 (Barry, Donna) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 15
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Plaintiff's #12 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED AS MOOT. In light of the Court's contemporaneously filed ORDER granting Plaintiff's #13 Revised Motion for Extension of Time, Plaintiff must file an opposition to Defendants' #11 Motion to Dismiss on or before March 23, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 17, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 14
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Plaintiff's #13 Revised Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED, absent objection and for good cause shown. Accordingly, Plaintiff must file an opposition to Defendants' #11 Motion to Dismiss on or before March 23, 2021. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on March 17, 2021. (Noble, N.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time until March 23, 2021Revised Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time until March 23, 2021 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo.Responses due by 3/9/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss or Transfer)(Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 02/16/2021 to File Responsive Pleading #6 Amended Complaint by Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo. (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey R. Hellman on behalf of Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo (Hellman, Jeffrey) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 8 First SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Letskus, Jr. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 7 First SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Letskus, Jr. Denise Ho served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/18/2021; KVC Group, LLC served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/18/2021; Prime Legal Firm served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/18/2021; Kim Vo served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/18/2021. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT pursuant to FRCP 15 against Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo, filed by Robert Letskus, Jr.(Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Denise Ho, KVC Group, LLC, Prime Legal Firm, Kim Vo* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael Andrew Zamat* *Peterson Zamat, LLC* *1275 Post Road Suite 200-D* *Fairfield, CT 06824*. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Robert Letskus, Jr. Signed by Clerk on 12/22/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 12/21/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/19/2021 Discovery due by 6/22/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 7/27/2021 Signed by Clerk on 12/21/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.]
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6287671.), filed by Robert Letskus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Zamat, Michael) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
| Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/28/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
