Mei Li v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas et al
Mei Li |
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and David M. Radel |
8:2022cv01401 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Douglas F McCormick |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (dgo) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge John D. Early to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:22-cv-01401 JWH(DFMx). (rn) |
Filing 10 MINUTE (In Chambers) Notice re Stipulation by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re: Stipulation to Stay Case #9 . As the proposed stay under the Stipulation would control proceedings beyond October 7, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge finds that an order amending the assignment order to shorten the parties' time to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is warranted here. As a result, unless all parties have filed consents (Form CV-11C (05/14)) to proceed under the assigned magistrate judge by Monday, September 19, 2022, the matter will be referred for automatic reassignment to a district judge. The assigned magistrate judge will not issue a ruling on the Stipulation in the interim absent such consent. The parties are free to withhold such consent without adverse substantive consequences. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Adjudication of Application filed by Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Joanne I. Osinoff added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I. Osinoff added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I. Osinoff added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft))(Osinoff, Joanne) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mei Li, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 8/8/2022, answer due 10/7/2022; Alejandro N. Mayorkas served on 8/8/2022, answer due 10/7/2022; David M. Radel served on 8/8/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit delivered confirmation, #2 Exhibit summons)(Wang, Justin) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Mei Li. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, David M. Radel. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mei Li, (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mei Li. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mei Li. (Wang, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33715149 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Mei Li. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Justin X Wang added to party Mei Li(pty:pla))(Wang, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.