Lea Reis v. Hyundai Motor America et al
Plaintiff: Lea Reis
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, - and Hyundai Motor Company
Case Number: 8:2022cv01405
Filed: July 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: John D Early
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: granting #23 Non-Resident Attorney Joseph G. Sauder APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Lea Reis, designating Alison M. Bernal as local counsel. (lom)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: granting #22 Non-Resident Attorney Matthew D. Schelkopf APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Lea Reis, designating Alison M. Bernal as local counsel. (lom)
September 16, 2022 Filing 23 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joseph G. Sauder to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Lea Reis (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34000871) filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bernal, Alison)
September 16, 2022 Filing 22 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew D. Schelkopf to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Lea Reis (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-34000832) filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bernal, Alison)
August 31, 2022 Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123) #20 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incomplete docket text; missing name of event and text content. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
August 30, 2022 Filing 20 (Attorney Miri Elisheva Gold added to party Hyundai Motor America(pty:dft), Attorney Miri Elisheva Gold added to party Hyundai Motor Company(pty:dft))(Gold, Miri)
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION RE SERVICE AND RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT #18 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. It is hereby ORDERED that the stipulation is granted as to the following: 1. Foreign entity Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) agrees to accept service of the Complaint (Doc. 1) and to waive the formalities of service under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(d) and not assert its rights under the Hague Convention for the purposes of this action only, expressly conditioned upon the terms stated in the Joint Stipulation. 2. All defendantsHMC and Hyundai Motor America, Inc. ("HMA")will serve their responses to the Complaint on the same day. 3. The deadline for HMC and HMA to respond to the Complaint is October 31, 2022. See order for details. (lom)
August 26, 2022 Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 31, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rocos, Oliver)
August 26, 2022 Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Oliver Rocos counsel for Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company. Adding Oliver Rocos as counsel of record for Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company. (Attorney Oliver Rocos added to party Hyundai Motor America(pty:dft), Attorney Oliver Rocos added to party Hyundai Motor Company(pty:dft))(Rocos, Oliver)
August 26, 2022 Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Ekwan E. Rhow counsel for Defendants Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company. Adding Ekwan E. Rhow as counsel of record for Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company. (Attorney Ekwan E. Rhow added to party Hyundai Motor America(pty:dft), Attorney Ekwan E. Rhow added to party Hyundai Motor Company(pty:dft))(Rhow, Ekwan)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: GRANTING #14 Non-Resident Attorney Bonner C. Walsh APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff, Lea Reis, designating Alison M. Bernal as local counsel. (shb)
August 15, 2022 Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Bonner C. Walsh to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Lea Reis (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33811795) filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Bernal, Alison)
August 1, 2022 Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Lea Reis re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis (Bernal, Alison)
July 29, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Matthew D. Schelkopf on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
July 29, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph G Sauder on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
July 29, 2022 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hyundai Motor Company. (et)
July 29, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hyundai Motor America. (et)
July 29, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
July 29, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 29, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et)
July 28, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Bernal, Alison)
July 28, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Bernal, Alison)
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis, identifying Lea Reis. (Bernal, Alison)
July 28, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Bernal, Alison)
July 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33716489 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Lea Reis. (Attorney Alison M. Bernal added to party Lea Reis(pty:pla))(Bernal, Alison)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lea Reis v. Hyundai Motor America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lea Reis
Represented By: Alison M. Bernal
Represented By: Bonner C. Walsh
Represented By: Joseph G. Sauder
Represented By: Matthew D. Schelkopf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America
Represented By: Ekwan E. Rhow
Represented By: Miri Elisheva Gold
Represented By: Oliver Rocos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor Company, -
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor Company
Represented By: Ekwan E. Rhow
Represented By: Miri Elisheva Gold
Represented By: Oliver Rocos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?